Just one more reason why we may need to consider disengaging from the UN

Or how the United Nations abuses the good faith and tolerance of the West to undermine our security and values:

ABC News on the armed robbery story behind our picture above”

‘Authorities in North Carolina don’t know whether they are looking for a man or a woman in the search for a burka-wearing bandit who walked into a bank Tuesday and pointed a gun at a teller before exiting with a bag full of money.”

A report by U.N. Special Rapporteur Martin Scheinin that is awaiting approval by the United Nations General Assembly says that security measures taken to detect terrorists “risk unduly penalising transgender persons whose personal appearance and data are subject to change.”

The report, which was issued August 3, places emphasis on “persons of diverse sexual orientation and gender identities” and recommends that counterterrorism operations be more sensitive to gender issues.

On page 19 the report says: “Enhanced immigration controls that focus attention on male bombers who may be dressing as females to avoid scrutiny make transgender persons susceptible to increased harassment and suspicion.”

Just a few sentences later, Scheinin writes that “counter-terrorism measures that involve increased travel document security, such as stricter procedures for issuing, changing and verifying identity documents, risk unduly penalising transgender persons whose personal appearance and data are subject to change.”

“This,” he claims, “jeopardises the right of persons of diverse sexual orientations and gender identities to recognition before the law”

Frank Gaffney, founder and president of the Center for Security Policy, blasted the report in an interview with CNSNews.com

“It strikes me as a parody of U.N. political correctness and sexual universality,” Gaffney said, “and it’s just hard for me to believe that anybody thinks that these notions actually should trump security concerns – as I think it’s only too clear that … the people who are trying to blow us up have absolutely no use for any of these sexual proclivities.”

Gaffney also pointed out that terrorists “would be only too delighted to take advantage – indeed we’ve seen them taking advantage – of burkas and other subterfuges to disguise their malign intents.”

The report also takes aim at perceived gender roles, suggesting that counter-terror practices involving both sexes be re-evaluated due to their basis in traditional perceptions of gender.

One passage, beginning on page 13, says that “the United Kingdom anti-radicalisation initiatives seeking to include Muslim women as counter-terrorism agents on the basis of their position ‘at the heart not only of their communities but also of their families,’ may reinforce stereotypical gender norms about roles of women within the family.”

“Instead,” Scheinin writes, “participation should be grounded on principles of gender equality, recognising the unique gendered impacts of both terrorism and counter-terrorism measures.”

Scheinin also slams the use of women’s rights as a justification for counter-terror operations, writing on page 14 that “counter-terrorism measures that are characterised as being a fight for women’s rights (such as the United States portrayal of its “war on terror” in Afghanistan in 2001) should be closely scrutinised, to ensure that they are not misinformed by gender-cultural stereotypes and are actually responsive to the concerns of women and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex individuals in local contexts.”

The use of masculine gender roles in counterterrorism draws Scheinin’s ire on page 18, where he writes that “techniques that seek to evoke feelings of emasculation in detainees or suspected terrorists may hinder the fight against terrorism by provoking hyper-masculine responses that include acceptance or advocacy of violence.”

Steven Groves, a fellow at the conservative Heritage Foundation, expressed a lack of surprise at the report, saying that it was comparable with Scheinin’s past work for the UN and typical of the UN Human Rights Council.

“Instead of the Human Rights Council focusing how the human rights of people who are blown apart by terrorists impact people’s human rights,” Groves said, “they created a new office for someone to go and make sure that the terrorists’ human rights, and the human rights of almost everyone else – except for the victims of terrorism – are being protected, and so that is (Scheinin’s) mission.”

“That he would stray into some wrong-headed report about gender stereotypes as part of his mandate on counterterrorism isn’t a surprise to me,” Groves continued, “this is the way that the United Nations and the Human Rights Council work.”

Still, Frank Gaffney was flabbergasted by Scheinin’s report, saying, “I find this truly absurd and appalling.”

The report is currently pending approval by the U.N. General Assembly, and CNSNews.com has reported that social conservatives are mounting a campaign against it due to its redefinition of gender.

We have written about the UN Human Rights Council frequently here – we believe it to be a complete parody of an organisation engaged in the rights of the lives of people.

It is effectively a proxy for two non-UN organisations which hate the West – the Organisation of the Islamic Conference (OIC) and the Non-Aligned Movement. Bizarre voting rules mean that it is heavily biased toward Islamic countries and African dictatorships – and, thereby – that the fox is in charge of the henhouse.

This means that the UN (mostly paid for by the West – particularly the US, Britain, Japan, Germany and France) takes as its main guiding authority such human rights luminaries as Hugo Chavez, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and the Burmese Junta.

On the matter of this particular issue – the US, Britain and Canada have all had incidents with male criminals and/or suspected terrorists using burkas to provide cover for an escape – it has also happened in Afghanistan and Iraq. Additionally, there have been cases where the Burka has been used as a disguise on homicide bombing missions.

So why all of a sudden then, are the UN representatives from the very worst possible countries in the world for a transvestite or a transexual to live, suddenly so concerned with the rights of the ‘transgendered community?

I’m sure we don’t really need to spell that out for you.

If the UN continues to pander to the world’s worst régimes and allow them to undermine the security of peaceful and civilised countries – then disengagement and disinvestment should be the only option.

How disgracefully these charlatans have corrupted the founding principles of the United Nations of 1945 – principles we at Un:dhimmi strongly support – but which, alas, have been perverted by a nefarious cabal of political Islamists, tyrants and banana republic dictators – and enabled by weak, unquestioning liberal dhimmis.

[Source: CSN News]

Comments are closed.